1866

The Gospel Advocate – April 17, 1866

by

The religion of Jesus Christ is not sectional, but the members of the Church of God have been sectionalized by influences beyond their control. For years, disciples in the Southern States have faced challenges in communion and cooperation. A proposed meeting aims to renew old acquaintances, foster Christian cooperation, and address the unique conditions faced by the brethren in the South. This gathering seeks to bridge divides and strengthen bonds among Christians, emphasizing that there is no South or North in the Gospel. Shall such a meeting be called? The importance of this question resonates deeply within our community.

The Gospel Advocate – April 10, 1866

by

In the April 10, 1866 edition of The Gospel Advocate, the editors passionately argue for the unity of Christians, emphasizing that the will of God is for His people to be one. They reflect on the early church, where believers shared a common faith and purpose, contrasting it with the divisions that arose over centuries. The call for a return to the simplicity of the Apostolic faith resonates throughout the text, urging readers to abandon sectarianism and embrace the truth of the Gospel. Discover how this historical perspective challenges modern divisions and inspires a quest for spiritual unity.

The Gospel Advocate – December 25, 1866

by

The closing year brings with it the close of our volume. We began the year with misgivings—on one side of us was a strong sectional party, interpreting every act and every principle with sole reference to their bearings on the peculiar interest or prejudice of the section. Yet, we devoutly thank our Father that He has enabled us to reach the close of the year with so few obstacles, and the evidence of good accomplished that presents itself all around us. Will our brethren and friends pray for us and labor with us, that we may do His will here below?

The Gospel Advocate – December 18, 1866

by

In the December 18, 1866 issue of The Gospel Advocate, a profound exploration of the Christian’s duty to civil government unfolds. The text challenges the notion of unconditional submission to earthly authorities, emphasizing that obedience to God must take precedence. It raises critical questions about the moral implications of obeying commands that conflict with divine law, urging readers to consider the weighty responsibility each individual holds in their relationship with God. This thought-provoking discourse invites reflection on the intersection of faith and governance, compelling believers to prioritize their allegiance to the divine above all earthly powers.

The Gospel Advocate – December 11, 1866

by

In the December 11, 1866 edition of The Gospel Advocate, the complex relationship between the Church of Christ and worldly powers is explored. The article delves into the divine ordination of authorities, urging Christians to submit to these powers while discerning their nature—good or evil. It challenges believers to understand their duty in a world where civil authorities may not always align with divine principles. This thought-provoking discourse invites readers to reflect on their responsibilities to God and society, emphasizing the importance of righteous living amidst the trials of earthly governance. Discover the full depth of this compelling discussion!

The Gospel Advocate – December 4, 1866

by

In the December 4, 1866 edition of The Gospel Advocate, the discussion centers on the tension between divine governance and human institutions. The editor, T. Fanning, explores the historical context of Israel’s demand for a king, highlighting how this request represented a rejection of God’s authority. He warns against the dangers of human polity infiltrating the Church, urging Christians to reflect on their commitment to divine principles rather than succumbing to worldly influences. This thought-provoking examination invites readers to consider the implications of their choices in faith and governance. Dive deeper into this compelling discourse!

The Gospel Advocate – November 27, 1866

by

To show that God’s institutions are good only for those for whom they are ordained and not for others, we simply instance the two great leading ordinances of God—Heaven and hell. Both are equally ordinances of God—both equally good for the purpose for which God ordained them. Yet both are not equally good and desirable in themselves. The Church of Jesus Christ, with Jesus the manifested leader and head, is one’s appointment for recovering and rewarding virtue and conducting all upward to God. Thus, the devil, the minister of hell, has his channels through which he exercises his continual engagement.

The Gospel Advocate – November 20, 1866

by

In the November 20, 1866 edition of The Gospel Advocate, we delve into the profound relationship between divine authority and earthly powers, exploring how God uses rulers like Nebuchadnezzar and the Assyrian as instruments of punishment for nations steeped in wickedness. This thought-provoking discourse challenges our understanding of servitude and divine justice, revealing that even those deemed as God’s servants can face retribution for their actions. Join us as we navigate these complex theological themes and witness the transformative power of faith amidst the trials of the time, including reports of revival meetings and the growth of congregations across the South.

The Gospel Advocate – November 13, 1866

by

In resuming the subject of the connection of the Church of Christ with the Church-Powers, we find that God’s institutions have always remained separate from those of man. This separation, maintained through the ages, reveals that human governments are often rooted in rebellion against divine authority. As we explore the historical conflicts between these earthly kingdoms and the true church, we uncover a profound truth: the more man seeks to govern apart from God, the more he strays from the path of righteousness. Join us as we delve deeper into this critical examination of faith, authority, and the eternal kingdom of God.

The Gospel Advocate – November 6, 1866

by

In a thought-provoking letter to Mr. David Kelly, T. Fanning challenges the notion of “Baptismal Regeneration” and the idea that men can seek God’s mercy without first submitting to Christ. He delves into the case of the thief on the cross, questioning the implications of his salvation and the conditions of pardon established by Christ. Fanning emphasizes the necessity of faith, repentance, and baptism as essential steps for salvation, urging a deeper understanding of scriptural teachings. This discourse invites readers to reflect on the true nature of faith and obedience in their spiritual journey.